DEAD DOLL HUMILIT b KATHY ACKE Copyright [c] 1990 by Kathy Acker, all rights reserved _Postmodern Culture_ vol. 1, no. 1 [Sep. 1990] IN ANY SOCIETY BASED ON CLASS, HUMILIATION IS POLITICAL REALITY. HUMILIATION IS ONE METHOD BY WHIC POLITICAL POWER IS TRANSFORMED INTO SOCIAL OR PERSONA RELATIONSHIPS. THE PERSONAL INTERIORIZATION OF TH PRACTICE OF HUMILIATION IS CALLED _HUMILITY_ CAPITOL IS AN ARTIST WHO MAKES DOLLS. MAKES, DAMAGES TRANSFORMS, SMASHES. ONE OF HER DOLLS IS A WRITE DOLL. THE WRITER DOLL ISN'T VERY LARGE AND IS AL HAIR, HORSE MANE HAIR, RAT FUR, DIRTY HUMAN HAIR PUSSY ONE NIGHT CAPITOL GAVE THE FOLLOWING SCENARIO T HER WRITER DOLL As a child in sixth grade in a North American school won first prize in a poetry contest In late teens and early twenties, entered New Yor City poetry world. Prominent Black Mountain poets mainly male, taught or attempted to teach her that writer becomes a writer when and only when he finds hi own voice CAPITOL DIDN'T MAKE ANY AVANT-GARDE POET DOLLS Since wanted to be a writer, tried hard to find her ow voice. Couldn't. But still loved to write. Loved t play with language. Language was material like clay o paint. Loved to play with verbal material, build u slums and mansions, demolish banks and half-rotte buildings, even buildings which she herself ha constructed, into never-before-seen, even unseeabl jewels To her, every word wasn't only material in itself but also sent out like beacons, other words. _Blue sent out _heaven_ and _The Virgin_. Material is rich I didn't create language, writer thought. Later sh would think about ownership and copyright. I' constantly being given language. Since this language world is rich and always changing, flowing, when write, I enter a world which has complex relations an is, perhaps, illimitable. This world both represent and is human history, public memories and privat memories turned public, the records and actualization of human intentions. This world is more than life an death, for here life and death conjoin. I can't mak language, but in this world, I can play and be played So where is 'my voice' Wanted to be a writer Since couldn't find 'her voice', decided she' first have to learn what a Black Mountain poet meant b 'his voice'. What did he do when he wrote A writer who had found his own voice presented viewpoint. Created meaning. The writer took a certai amount of language, verbal material, forced tha language to stop radiating in multiple, eve unnumerable directions, to radiate in only on direction so there could be his meaning The writer's voice wasn't exactly this meaning The writer's voice was a process, how he had forced th language to obey him, his will. The writer's voice i the voice of the writer-as-God Writer thought, Don't want to be God; have neve wanted to be God. All these male poets want to be th top poet, as if, since they can't be a dictator in th political realm, can be dictator of this world Want to play. Be left alone to play. Want to b a sailor who journeys at every edge and even into th unknown. See strange sights, see. If I can't keep o seeing wonders, I'm in prison. Claustrophobia's siste to my worst nightmare: lobotomy, the total loss o perceptual power, of seeing new. If had to forc language to be uni-directional, I'd be helping my ow prison to be constructed There are enough prisons outside, outsid language Decided, no. Decided that to find her own voic would be negotiating against her joy. That's what th culture seemed to be trying to tell her to do Wanted only to write. Was writing. Would keep o writing without finding 'her own voice'. To hell wit the Black Mountain poets even though they had taugh her a lot Decided that since what she wanted to do was jus to write, not to find her own voice, could and woul write by using anyone's voice, anyone's text, whateve materials she wanted to use Had a dream while waking that was running wit animals. Wild horses, leopards, red fox, kangaroos mountain lions, wild dogs. Running over rolling hills Was able to keep up with the animals and they accepte her Wildness was writing and writing was wildness Decision not to find this own voice but to use an be other, multiple, even innumerable, voices led to tw other decisions There were two kinds of writing in her culture good literature and schlock. Novels which won literar prizes were good literature; science fiction and horro novels, pornography were schlock. Good literatur concerned important issues, had a high moral content and, most important, was written according to well established rules of taste, elegance, and conservatism Schlock's content was sex horror violence and othe aspects of human existence abhorrent to all but th lowest of the low, the socially and morall unacceptable. This trash was made as quickly a possible, either with no regard for the regulations o politeness or else with regard to the crudest, mos vulgar techniques possible. Well-educated intelligent, and concerned people read good literature Perhaps because the masses were gaining politica therefore economic and social control, not only o literary production, good literature was read by a elite diminishing in size and cultural strength Decided to use or to write both good literatur and schlock. To mix them up in terms of content an formally, offended everyone Writing in which all kinds of writing mingle seemed, not immoral, but amoral, even to the masses Played in every playground she found; no one can d that in a class or hierarchichal society [In literature classes in university, had learne that anyone can say or write anything about anything i he or she does so cleverly enough. That cleverness one of the formal rules of good literature, can be method of social and political manipulation. Decide to use language stupidly.] In order to use and b other voices as stupidly as possible, decided to cop down simply other texts Copy them down while, maybe, mashing them u because wasn't going to stop playing in any playground Because loved wildness Having fun with texts is having fun wit everything and everyone. Since didn't have one poin of view or centralized perspective, was free to fin out how texts she used and was worked. In thei contexts which were [parts of] culture Liked best of all mushing up texts Began constructing her first story by placin mashed-up texts by and about Henry Kissinger next t 'True Romance' texts. What was the true romance o America? Changed these 'True Romance' texts only b heightening the sexual crudity of their style. Int this mush, placed four pages out of Harold Robbins' one of her heroes', newest hottest bestsellers. Ha first made Jacqueline Onassis the star of Robbins text Twenty years later, a feminist publishing hous republished the last third of the novel in which thi mash occurred CAPITOL MADE A FEMINIST PUBLISHER DOLL EVEN THOUGH BECAUSE SHE WASN'T STUPID, SHE KNEW THAT THE FEMINIS PUBLISHING HOUSE WAS ACTUALLY A LOT OF DOLLS. TH FEMINIST PUBLISHER DOLL WAS A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN IN A ST LAURENT DRESS. CAPITOL, PERHAPS OUT OF PERVERSITY REFRAINED FROM USING HER USUAL CHEWED UP CHEWING GUM HALF-DRIED FLECKS OF NAIL POLISH, AND BITS OF HER OW BODY THAT HAD SOMEHOW FALLEN AWAY Republished the text containing the Harold Robbins mush next to a text she had written only seventee years ago. In this second text, the only one had eve written without glopping up hacking into and rewritin other texts [appropriating], had tried to destro literature or what she as a writer was supposed t write by making characters and a story that were s stupid as to be almost non-existent. Ostensibly, th second text was a porn book. The pornography wa almost as stupid as the story. The female characte had her own name Thought just after had finished writing this, her is a conventional novel. Perhaps, here is 'my voice' Now I'll never again have to make up a bourgeois novel Didn't The feminist publisher informed her that thi second text was her most important because here she ha written a treatise on female sexuality Since didn't believe in arguing with people, wrot an introduction to both books in which stated that he only interest in writing was in copying down othe people's texts. Didn't say liked messing them u because was trying to be polite. Like the English Did say had no interest in sexuality or in any othe content CAPITOL MADE A DOLL WHO WAS A JOURNALIST. CAPITO LOVED MAKING DOLLS WHO WERE JOURNALISTS. SOMETIMES SH MADE THEM OUT OF THE NEWSPAPERS FOUND IN TRASHCANS O THE STREETS. SHE KNEW THAT LOTS OF CATS INHABITE TRASH CANS. THE PAPERS SAID RATS CARRY DISEASES. SH MADE THIS JOURNALIST OUT OF THE FINGERNAILS SH OBTAINED BY HANGING AROUND THE TRASHCANS IN THE BAC LOTS OF LONDON HOSPITALS. HAD PENETRATED THESE BAC LOTS WITH THE HOPE OF MEETING MEAN OLDER MEN BIKERS FOUND LOTS OF OTHER THINGS THERE. SINCE, TO MAKE TH JOURNALIST, SHE MOLDED THE FINGERNAILS TOGETHER WIT SUPER GLUE AND, BEING A SLOB, LOTS OF OTHER THING STUCK TO THIS SUPER GLUE, THE JOURNALIST DIDN'T LOO ANYTHING LIKE A HUMAN BEING A journalist who worked on a trade publishing magazine so the story went, no one could remember whose story was informed by another woman in her office that ther was a resemblance between a section of the writer' book and Harold Robbins' work. Most of the literati o the country in which the writer was currently livin were upper-middle class and detested the writer and he writing CAPITOL THOUGHT ABOUT MAKING A DOLL OF THIS COUNTRY BUT DECIDED NOT TO Journalist decided she had found a scoop. Phoned u the feminist publisher to enquire about plagiarism perhaps feminist publisher said something wrong becaus then phoned up Harold Robbins' publisher "Surely all art is the result of one's having bee in danger, of having gone through an experience all th way to the end, where no one can go any further. Th further one goes, the more private, the more personal the more singular an experience becomes, and the thin one is making is finally, the necessary, irrepressible and, as nearly as possible, definitive utterance o this singularity . . . Therein lies the enormous ai the work of art brings to the life of the one who mus make it . . "So we are most definitely called upon to test an try ourselves against the utmost, but probably we ar also bound to keep silence regarding this utmost, t beware of sharing it, of parting with it i communication so long as we have not entered the wor of art: for the utmost represents nothing other tha that singularity in us which no one would or eve should understand, and which must enter into the wor as such . . . " Rilke to Cezanne CAPITOL MADE A PUBLISHER LOOK LIKE SAM PECKINPAH THOUGH SHE HAD NO IDEA WHAT SAM PECKINPAH LOOKED LIKE HAD LOOKED LIKE? SHE TOOK A HOWDY DOODY DOLL AND A ALFRED E. NEUMAN DOLL AND MASHED THEM TOGETHER, THE MADE THIS CONGLOMERATE INTO AN AMERICAN OFFICER IN TH MEXICAN-AMERICAN WAR. ACTUALLY SEWED, SHE HATE SEWING, OR WHEN SHE BECAME TIRED OF SEWING, GLUE TOGETHER WITH HER OWN TWO HANDS, JUST AS THE EARL AMERICAN PATRIOT WIVES USED TO DO FOR THEIR PATRIO HUSBANDS, A FROGGED AND BRAIDED CAVALRY JACKET, STAINE WITH THE BLOOD FROM SOME FORMER OWNERS. THEN FASHIONE A STOVEPIPE HAT OUT OF ONE SHE HAD STOLEN FROM A BUM I AN ECSTASY OF ART. THE HAT WAS A BIT BIG. FOR TH PUBLISHER. INSIDE A GOLD HEART, THERE SHOULD BE PICTURE OF A WOMAN. SINCE CAPITOL DIDN'T HAVE PICTURE OF A WOMAN, SHE PUT IN ONE OF HER MOTHER SINCE SAM PECKINPAH OR HER PUBLISHER HAD SEEN TRAGEDY AN ARROW HANGING OUT OF THE WHITE BREAST OF A SOLDIE NO OLDER THAN A CHILD, HORSES GONE MAD WALLEYED MOUTH FROTHING AMID DUST THICKER THAN THE SMOKE OF GUNS. SH MADE HIS FACE FULL OF FOLDS, AN EYEPATCH OVER ONE EYE Harold Robbins' publisher phoned up the man who ran th company who owned the feminist publishing company From now on, known as 'The Boss'. The Boss told Harol Robbins' publisher that they have a plagiarist in thei midst CAPITOL NO LONGER WANTED TO MAKE DOLLS. IN THE UNITE STATES, UPON SEEING THE WORK OF THE PHOTOGRAPHER ROBER MAPPLETHORPE, SENATOR JESSE HELMS PROPOSED AN AMENDMEN TO THE FISCAL YEAR 1990 INTERIOR AND RELATED AGENCIE BILL FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROHIBITING "THE USE O APPROPRIATED FUNDS FOR THE DISSEMINATION, PROMOTION, O PRODUCTION OF OBSCENE OR INDECENT MATERIALS O MATERIALS DENIGRATING A PARTICULAR RELIGION." THRE SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF UNACCEPTABLE MATERIAL FOLLOWED "[1] OBSCENE OR INDECENT MATERIALS, INCLUDING BUT NO LIMITED TO DEPICTIONS OF SADOMASOCHISM [ALWAYS GET THA ONE IN FIRST], HOMO-EROTICISM, THE EXPLOITATION O CHILDREN, OR INDIVIDUALS ENGAGED IN SEX ACTS; OR [2 MATERIAL WHICH DENIGRATES THE OBJECTS OR BELIEFS OF TH ADHERENTS OF A PARTICULAR RELIGION OR NON-RELIGION; O [3] MATERIAL WHICH DENIGRATES, DEBASES, OR REVILES PERSON, GROUP, OR CLASS OF CITIZENS ON THE BASIS O RACE, CREED, SEX, HANDICAP, AGE, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. IN HONOR OF JESSE HELMS, CAPITOL MADE, AS PILLOWS, CROSS AND A VAGINA. SO THE POOR COULD HAVE SOMEWHER TO SLEEP. SINCE SHE NO LONGER HAD TO MAKE DOLLS O ART, BECAUSE ART IS DEAD IN THIS CULTURE, SHE SLOPPE THE PILLOWS TOGETHER WITH DEAD FLIES, WHITE FLOU MOISTENED BY THE BLOOD SHE DREW OUT OF HER SMALLES FINGER WITH A PIN, AND OTHER TYPES OF GARBAGE Disintegration Feminist publisher then informed writer that th Boss and Harold Robbins' publisher had decided, due t her plagiarism, to withdraw the book from publicatio and to have her sign an apology to Harold Robbins whic they had written. This apology would then be publishe in two major publishing magazines Ordinarily impolite, told feminist publisher the could do what they wanted with their edition of he books but she wasn't going to apologize to anyone fo anything, much less for twenty years of work Didn't have to think to herself because ever square inch of her knew. For freedom. Writing must b for and must be freedom Feminist publisher replied that she knew write was actually a nice sweet girl Asked if should tell her agent or try talkin directly to Harold Robbins Feminist publisher replied she'd take care o everything. Writer shouldn't contact Harold Robbin because that would make everything worse Would, the feminist publisher asked, the write please compose a statement for the Boss why the write used other texts when she wrote so that the Bos wouldn't believe that she was a plagiarist CAPITOL MADE A DOLL WHO LOOKED EXACTLY LIKE HERSELF IF YOU PRESSED A BUTTON ON ONE OF THE DOLL'S CUNT LIP THE DOLL SAID, "I AM A GOOD GIRL AND DO EXACTLY AS I A TOLD TO DO. Wrote Nobody save buzzards. Lots of buzzards here. I the distance, lay flies and piles of shit. Herd of animals move against the skyline like blac caravans in an unknown east. Sheeps and goats Another place, a horse is lapping the water of pool. Lavendar and grey trees behind this blac water are leafless and spineless. As the da ends, the sun in the east flushes out pal lavendars and pinks, then turns blood red as i turns on itself, becoming a more definitive shape the more definitive, the bloodier. Until it sits totally unaware of the rest of the universe waiting at the edge of a sky that doesn't yet kno what colors it wants to be, a hawk waiting for th inevitable onset of human slaughter. The light i fleeing Instead, sent a letter to feminist publisher i which said that she composed her texts out of 'real conversations, anything written down, other texts somewhat in the ways the Cubists had worked. [No quite true. But thought this statemen understandable.] Cited, as example, her use of 'Tru Confessions' stories. Such stories whose content seeme purely and narrowly sexual, composed simply fo purposes of sexual titillation and economic profit, i deconstructed, viewed in terms of context and genre became signs of political and social realities. So i the writer or critic [deconstructionist] didn't wor with the actual language of these texts, the writer o critic wouldn't be able to uncover the political an social realities involved. For instance, both genr and the habitual nature of perception hide the violenc of the content of many newspaper stories To uncover this violence is to run the risk o being accused of loving violence or all kinds o pornography. [As if the writer gives a damn about wha anyone considers risks. Wrote, living art rather than dead art has som connection with passion. Deconstructions of newspape stories become the living art in a culture that demand that any artistic representation of life be non-violen and non-sexual, misrepresent To copy down, to appropriate, to deconstruct othe texts is to break down those perceptual habits th culture doesn't want to be broken Deconstruction demands not so much plagiarism a breaking into the copyright law In the Harold Robbins' text which had used, a ric white woman walks into a disco, picks up a black boy has sex with him. In the Robbins' text, this scene i soft-core porn, has as its purpose mild sexua titillation and pleasure [When Robbins' book had been published years ago the writer's mother had said that Robbins had use Jacqueline Onassis as the model for the rich whit woman.] Wrote, had made apparent that bit of politic while amplifying the pulp quality of the style in orde to see what would happen when the underlyin presuppositions or meanings of Robbins' writing becam clear. Robbins as emblematic of a certain part o American culture. What happened was that the sterilit of that part of American culture revealed itself. Th real pornography. Cliches, especially sexual cliches are always signs of power or political relationships BECAUSE SHE HAD JUST GOTTEN HER PERIOD, CAPITOL MADE HUGE RED SATIN PILLOW CROSS THEN SMEARED HER BLOOD AL OVER IT Her editor at the feminist publisher said that the Bos had found her explanation "literary." Later would b informed that this was a legal, not a literary, matter "HERE IT ALL STINKS," CAPITOL THOUGHT. "ART IS MAKIN ACCORDING TO THE IMAGINATION. BUT HERE, BUYING AN SELLING ARE THE RULES; THE RULES OF COMMODITY HAV DESTROYED THE IMAGINATION. HERE, THE ONLY ART ALLOWE IS MADE BY POST-CAPITALIST RULES; ART ISN'T MAD ACCORDING TO RULES." ANGER MAKES YOU WANT TO SUICIDE Journalist who broke the 'Harold Robbins story' ha been phoning and leaving messages on writer's answerin machine for days. Had stopped answering her phone. B chance picked it up; journalist asked her if anythin to say "You mean about Harold Robbins? Silence "I've just given my publisher a statement Perhaps you could read that. "Do you have anything to add to it?" As if sh was a criminal A few days later writer's agent over the phon informed writer what was happening was simply horrible CAPITOL DIDN'T WANT TO MAKE ANY DOLLS How could the writer be plagiarizing Harold Robbins Writer didn't know Agent told writer if writer had phoned he immediately, agent could have straightened ou everything because she was good friends with Harol Robbins' publisher. But now it was too late Writer asked agent if she could do anything Agent answered that she'd phone Harold Robbins publisher and that the worst that could happen is tha she'd have to pay a nominal quotation rights fee So a few days later was surprised when feminis publisher informed her that if she didn't sign th apology to Harold Robbins which they had written fo her, feminist publishing company would go down a drai because Harold Robins or harold Robbins' publishe would slap a half-a-million [dollar? pound?] lawsuit o the feminist publishing house Decided she had to take notice of this stupi affair, though her whole life wanted to notice onl writing and sex "WHAT IS IT" CAPITOL WROTE, "TO BE AN ARTIST? WHERE I THE VALUE THAT WILL KEEP THIS LIFE IN HELL GOING? For one of the first times in her life, was deepl scared. Was usually as wild as they come. Doin anything if it felt good. So when succumbed to fear succumbed to reasonless, almost bottomless fear Panicked only because she might be forced t apologize, not to Harold Robbins, that didn't matter but to anyone for her writing, for what seemed to b her life. Book had already been withdrawn from print Wasn't that enough? Panicked, phoned her agent withou waiting for her agent to phone her Agent asked writer if she knew how she stoo legally Writer replied that as far as knew Harold Robbin had made no written charge. Feminist publishe sometime in beginning had told her they had spoken to solicitor who had said neither she nor they "had a le to stand on." Since didn't know with what she wa being charged, she didn't know what that meant Agent replied, "Perhaps we should talk to solicitor. Do you know a solicitor? Knew the name of a tax solicitor Since had no money, asked her American publishe what to do, if he knew a lawyer WOULD MAKE NO MORE DOLLS American publisher informed her couldn't ask anyone' advice until she knew the charges against her, saw the in writing Asked the feminist publisher to send the charge against her and whatever else was in writing to her Received two copies of the 'Harold Robbins' tex she had written twenty years ago, one copy of th apology she was supposed to sign, and a letter fro Harold Robbins' publisher to the head of the feminis publishing company. Letter said they were not seekin damages beyond withdrawal of the book from publicatio [which had already taken place] and the apology Didn't know of what she was guilty Later would receive a copy of the letter sent t her feminist publisher from the solicitor whom th feminist publisher and then her agent had consulted Letter stated: According to the various documents an texts which the feminist publisher had supplied, th writer should apologize to Mr. Harold Robbins. First because in her text she has used a substantial numbe of Mr. Robbins' words. Second, because she did not us any texts other than Mr. Robbins' so there could be n literary theory or praxis responsible for he plagiarism. Third, because the contract between th writer and the feminist publisher states that th writer had not infringed upon any existing copyright When the writer wrote, not wrote back, to th solicitor that most of the novel in question had bee appropriated from other texts, that most of these text had been in the public domain, that the writers o texts not in the public domain were either writers o 'True Confessions' stories [anonymous] or writers wh knew she had reworked their texts and felt honored except for Mr. Robbins, that she had neve misrepresented nor hidden her usages of other texts her methods of composition, that there was already body of literary criticism on her and others' method of appropriation, and furthermore [this was to becom the major point of contention], that she would no sign the apology because she could not since there wa no assurance that all possible litigation an harassment would end with the signature of guilt guilt which anyway she didn't feel: the solicitor di not reply Not knowing of what she was guilty, feelin isolated, and pressured to finish her new novel, write became paranoid. Would do anything to stop th pressure from the feminist publisher and simultaneousl would never apologize for her work Considered her American publisher her father Told her that the 'Harold Robbins affair' was a joke she should take the phone off the hook, go to Paris fo a few days Finish your book. That's what's important WOULD MAKE NO MORE DOLLS Paris is a beautiful city In Paris decided that it's stupid to live in fear Didn't yet know what to do about isolation. All tha matters is work and work must be created in and can' be created in isolation. [Remembered a conversatio she had had with her feminist publisher. Still tryin to explain, writer said, in order to deconstruct, th deconstructionist needs to use the actual other texts Editor had said she understood. For instance, she wa sure, Peter Carey in _Oscar and Lucinda_ had used othe people's writings in his dialogue, but he would neve admit it. This writer did what every other writer did but she is the only one who admits it. "It's not matter of not being able to write," the writer replied It's a matter of a certain theory which is also literary theory. Theory and belief." Then shut u because knew that when you have to explain and explain nothing is understood. Language is dead. SINCE THERE WERE NO MORE DOLLS, CAPITOL STARTED WRITIN LANGUAGE Decided that it's stupid living in fear of being force to be guilty without knowing why you're guilty and more important, it's stupid caring about what ha nothing to do with art. It doesn't really matte whether or not you sign the fucking apology Over the phone asked the American publishe whether or not it mattered to her past work whether o not signed the apology Answered that the sole matter was her work Thought alike Wanted to ensure that there was no more sloppines in her work or life, that from now on all her action served only her writing. Upon returning to England consulted a friend who consulted a solicitor who wa his friend about her case. This solicitor advised tha since she wasn't guilty of plagiarism and since the la was unclear, grey, about whether or not she ha breached Harold Robbins' copyright, it could be a lega precedent, he couldn't advise whether or not she shoul sign the apology. But must not sign unless, upo signing, received full and final settlement Informed her agent that would sign if and only i received full and final settlement upon signing Over the phone, feminist publisher asked her wh had told her about full and final settlement A literary solicitor Could they, the feminist publishing house, hav his name and his statement in writing "This is my decision," writer said. "That's al you need to know. WROTE DOWN "PRAY FOR US THE DEAD," THE FIRST LINE I THE FIRST POEM BY CHARLES OLSON SHE HAD EVER READ WHE SHE WAS A TEENAGER. ALL THE DOLLS WERE DEAD. DEA HAIR. WHEN SHE LOOKED UP THIS POEM, ITS FIRST LIN WAS, "WHAT DOES NOT CHANGE/ IS THE WILL TO CHANGE. WENT TO A NEARBY CEMETERY AND WITH STICK DOWN I SAND WROTE THE WORDS "PRAY FOR US THE DEAD." THOUGHT WHO IS DEAD? THE DEAD TREES? WHO IS DEAD? WE LIVE I SERVICE OF THE SPIRIT. MADE MASS WITH TREES DEAD AN DIRT AND UNDERNEATH HUMANS AS DEAD OR LIVING AS AN STONE OR WOOD I WON'T BURY MY DEAD DOLLS, THOUGHT. I'LL STEP ON THE AND MASH THEM UP For two weeks didn't hear from either her agent o feminist publisher. Could return to finishing he novel Thought that threats had died In two weeks received a letter from her agen which read something like On your express instructions that your publishe communicate to you through me, your publisher ha informed me that they have communicated to Harol Robbins your decision that you will sign the apolog which his publisher drew up only if you have hi assurance that there will be no further harassment o litigation. Because you have requested such assurance predictably, Harold Robbins is now requiring damages t be paid Your publisher now intends to sign and publish th apology to Harold Robbins as soon as possible whethe or not you sign it In view of what I have discovered about the natur of your various telephone communications to me, pleas contact me only in writing from now on Signature Understood that she had lost. Lost more than struggle about the appropriation of four pages, abou the definition of _appropriation_. Lost her belie that there can be art in this culture. Lost spirit All humans have to die, but they don't have to fail Fail in all that matters It turned out that the whole affair was nothing CAPITOL REALIZED THAT SHE HAD FORGOTTEN TO BURY TH WRITER DOLL. SINCE THE SMELL OF DEATH STUNK, RETURNE TO THE CEMETERY TO BURY HER. SHE KICKED OVER A ROC AND THREW THE DOLL INTO THE HOLE WHICH THE ROCK HA MADE. CHANTED, "YOU'RE NOT SELLING ENOUGH BOOKS I CALIFORNIA. YOU'D BETTER GO THERE IMMEDIATELY. TRY T GET INTO READING IN ANY BENEFIT YOU CAN SO FIVE MOR BOOKS WILL BE SOLD. YOU HAVE BAGS UNDER YOUR EYES. CAPITOL THOUGHT, DEAD DOLL SINCE CAPITOL WAS A ROMANTIC, SHE BELIEVED DEAT IS PREFERABLE TO A DEAD LIFE, A LIFE NOT LIVE ACCORDING TO THE DICTATES OF THE SPIRIT SINCE SHE WAS THE ONE WHO HAD POWER IN THE DOLL HUMAN RELATIONSHIP, HER DOLLS WERE ROMANTICS TOO Toward the end of paranoia, had told her story to a friend who was secretary to a famous writer. Informed her that famous writer's first lawyer used to work with Harold Robbins' present lawyer. First lawyer was friends with her American publisher. Her American publisher asked the lawyer who was his friend to speak privately to Harold Robbins' lawyer. Later the lawyer told the American publisher tha Harold Robbins' lawyer advised to let the matter die quietly. This lawyer himself advised that under no circumstances should the writer sign anything. It turned out that the whole affair was nothing. Despite these lawyer's advice, Harold Robbins' publisher and the feminist publisher kept pressing the writer to sign the apology and eventually, as everything becomes nothing, she had to. Knew that none of the above has anything to do with what matters, writing. Except for the failure of the spirit. THEY'RE ALL DEAD, CAPITOL THOUGHT. THEIR DOLLS' FLESH IS NOW BECOMING PART OF THE DIRT. CAPITOL THOUGHT, IS MATTER MOVING THROUGH FORMS DEAD OR ALIVE? CAPITOL THOUGHT, THEY CAN'T KILL THE SPIRIT.